abtinf 9 hours ago

> "[it's] purely a financial decision"

> "It is not related in any way to the show’s performance"

Naively, these seem like contradictory statements.

  • readthenotes1 9 hours ago

    Among other things, Colbert said:

    “Now, I believe this kind of complicated financial settlement with a sitting government official has a technical name in legal circles: It’s big fat bribe, because this all comes as Paramount owners are trying to get the Trump administration to approve the sale of our network to a new owner, Skydance.”

    maybe they are worried that Colbert will say things that are actionable and could lead to more lawsuits?

    • throw0101d an hour ago

      > maybe they are worried that Colbert will say things that are actionable and could lead to more lawsuits?

      Trump sues people even if things are not actionable. (And sometimes those people cave / bend the knee.)

  • x3n0ph3n3 9 hours ago

    It could be that Colbert's pay has outpaced advertising revenue.

    • whoknowsidont 7 hours ago

      Yeah, definitely not related to the buyout nor the close ties that the executive team has to Trump.

pm90 10 hours ago

Extremely disturbing to see the US Press go the same way as the Indian Press did under Modi.

  • dehrmann 9 hours ago

    I'd worry more about defunding public broadcasting or the Washington Post editorial stance. There's a good faith argument here that the cause was market conditions:

    > The genre has been struggling as the majority of the country migrates in droves to streaming entertainment and away from traditional broadcast and cable television...

    > The number of late-night shows has dwindled in recent years...

    > The genre has also experienced a sharp decline in advertising revenue in recent years...

  • Sai_ 10 hours ago

    At some level, it is worse. The Indian press never sold us citizens koolaid about freedom, talking truth to power, and patted themselves on the back about winning Pulitzer Prizes for journalism.

    The Indian press knows it is a bottom feeder and doesn’t try not to be which gives space for critical thought to emerge (even if it masked as extreme cynicism - “everyone is corrupt”) which results in extreme skepticism of everyone.

  • ProAm 9 hours ago

    America is over as we have known if for the last 95 years

    • andrewinardeer 8 hours ago

      All good things must come to an end and when one door closes, another opens.

      Perhaps Colbert will sign with another network and bring bigger and better ideas to the small screen.

      • whoknowsidont 6 hours ago

        This is like telling someone to switch from Comcast to another ISP. The choices are limited. Oh and in this case, they're all owned by like two media conglomerates.

  • nwah1 10 hours ago

    The Late Show has an elderly and shrinking audience. And, Colbert hasn't been funny in years, nor has he been challenging the powers that be.

    When he did the White House Correspondents' Dinner and roasted George W Bush, that was extremely edgy. The Colbert Report was also wickedly funny.

    But the Late Show makes John Oliver look like Lenny Bruce.

    • whoknowsidont 7 hours ago

      The Late Show was the only show to have positive viewership rates from Q1 to Q2 while maintaining the largest share of viewers.

      It's hardly a shrinking audience.

DrNosferatu 7 hours ago

Really confused about this:

Why the flagging?

Flatcircle 10 hours ago

Shouldn’t be surprising, every late night show is going to end soon. They’re all too expensive

  • dawnerd 10 hours ago

    It’s currently the number one late night show. It’s not about money. It’s because the president pressured them after Colbert called the network out Tuesday for taking a bribe.

    • dec0dedab0de 9 hours ago

      I think Gutfeld is number 1 overall, and has been for a while.

      But TV ratings overall are down so low, I haven’t had cable since 2003, and at the time people thought I was a radical. Now it seems like the people that have cable are the rare ones, Especially if there is noone over 45 in the house.

      There is a reason they all format their shows in a way that is easy to break up into youtube videos. If they didn’t, most kids under 30 wouldn't even know who they are

      • tim333 2 hours ago

        I'd never heard of Gutfeld - I'm a Brit - so checked it out - https://youtu.be/MflEEkCFtHY It doesn't seem very good..? The first few seconds is him jokinging insulting various democrats and the audience groaning.

      • xnx 9 hours ago

        > I think Gutfeld is number 1 overall, and has been for a while.

        From what I saw, Gutfeld is top in that time slot, but not for late night overall.

        I agree that cable is crazy to pay so much money for and still have frequent and long commercial interruptions.

        • 5555624 4 hours ago

          Assuming this table (https://latenighter.com/news/ratings/late-night-tv-ratings-q...) is accurate (and I am reading it correctly), Gutfeld has more average number of viewers than the other late night shows.

          • dawnerd 4 hours ago

            His show airs much earlier than the others which is why it’s not really considered the top late night. The rankings I was referring to were the true late night shows. Gutfeld is basically prime time.

  • paleotrope 9 hours ago

    How can they be so expensive? Unless you mean in relation to ad revenue.

    It's one host, maybe a band, they don't pay the guests cause their there to pitch their show/music/book/film. Maybe all the extra staff they need to write jokes and whatnot. Maybe all the drug advertisements really don't pay all that much anymore.

    • favorited 9 hours ago

      Late night talk shows are extremely cheap, compared to regular scripted television. It's one of the reasons why NBC was so excited about moving Jay Leno to 10pm when Conan took over The Tonight Show:

      > The Jay Leno Show WILL be significantly cheaper than any primetime scripted show NBC could program. Primetime scripted programming usually costs about $3 million per hour; so the five hours NBC is revamping would total about $15 million per week. This new Leno show will cost NBC less than $2 million per week. ... So, not only does NBC get to KEEP its primetime hours, it gets to program them with a more cost-effective show.

      https://www.writersdigest.com/industry-updates/jay-leno-nbc-...

  • nemomarx 10 hours ago

    How expensive can they be? One set, minimal editing?

whoknowsidont 7 hours ago

Why are these very interesting and topical threads being flagged? I'd love for someone pressing that button to explain the rationale.

  • bananapub 4 hours ago

    basically every article that is anti-the-US-regime gets flagged.

xnx 9 hours ago

I'm in Central time and love Colbert, but I'd never watch it if I lived in Eastern and had to wait until 11:35 PM.

  • tim333 3 hours ago

    I'm in London and watch sometimes on youtube. It's been years since I watched a program on TV at the official time you are supposed to watch it.

    • xnx 30 minutes ago

      Yes. It's great that they put up the monologue so quickly after it airs.

nteleky 7 hours ago

Honest, informed satire that's often more helpful in learning about real issues than "the news"; no surprise it's being cancelled. This and John Oliver are probably the last real holdouts in honest media in the current era, from what I've seen.

  • bad_username 6 hours ago

    From my observations, Colbert's satire strictly represents one segment of the political spectrum. So it's either not informed, or not honest.

    • cam_l 2 hours ago

      Name it up.

      Or don't, whatever.. just be a chickenshit about it.

      • HonestOp001 an hour ago

        I will do it. The Covid vaccine propaganda.

        Could not be a better example of how it leaned one way.

electroglyph 10 hours ago

didn't he talk shit about the Paramount deal just a couple days ago?

ivape 10 hours ago

Their beefing over South Park as well:

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/sou...

At the heart of the dispute: a new 10-year, $3 billion overall deal for Parker and Stone that would more than triple the valuation of the current deal that expires in 2027

Yeah. So that's not going to happen lol.

  • paleotrope 9 hours ago

    "One possible factor in the negotiations: an $800 million loan that Park County took in 2023 from private equity firm the Carlyle Group. Parker and Stone could be squeezed for cash to repay roughly $80 million in interest per year, according to one person knowledgeable of the arrangement, who noted that Paramount may be open to paying more than $150 million annually in a new deal but not for 10 years."

    That's quite the loan.

    • paleotrope 9 hours ago

      Apparently they needed to refinance a 600 million loan from 2021.

      "The loan would be made through Carlyle’s credit arm and would refinance an existing $600 million debt facility provided by HPS Investment Partners in 2021, according to the report."

      What the hell have they been spending it on?

      • x3n0ph3n3 9 hours ago

        Maybe some of that went towards Casa Bonita?

        • paleotrope 9 hours ago

          They said ~40 million. And that seems crazy high for a theme restaurant. I think they just don't know how to manage money.

iwontberude 10 hours ago

I hope now that he’s done selling out, he can return to the Colbert Report

  • Dwedit 10 hours ago

    Same company owns both CBS and Comedy Central.

    • dec0dedab0de 9 hours ago

      he could change the name and make it a podcast, but i haven’t really liked him since he was on the daily show.

      • xnx 9 hours ago

        Mr. Steven's Podcast

    • cchance 10 hours ago

      Mega Conglomerations basically fucking own everything, late stage capitalism

      • jschveibinz 9 hours ago

        They don't own you. Don’t be a victim--go and make something you love.

  • plemer 9 hours ago

    In what way do you think Colbert sold out?