echelon_musk 18 minutes ago

Seems like there's a gulf between the artist's computer rendering and the mosaic.

dr_dshiv 40 minutes ago

It was the tallest building in the world? And it survived till the 1300s?? Wild.

dang an hour ago
  • jaysonelliot 3 hours ago

    Using Midjourney to visualize a historical structure like this is not just lazy, it's very misleading.

    Especially when there are actual digital recreations, available for free use under Creative Commons, based on historical information and modern surveys: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PHAROS2013-3000x2250...

    • IG_Semmelweiss an hour ago

      I dont understand your comment

      Your comment implies that (some) article images are somehow the result of LLMs. I don't think that is the case at all based on the articles' source attributions.

  • lapetitejort 5 hours ago

    > Interpretation of the Lighthouse of Alexandria. Credit: Midjounrey / Open Domain / Free Use

    In addition to not paying artists for interpretations, they also apparently do not pay editors to proofread.

    • richwater 5 hours ago

      A human artist rendering would not have changed how anyone consumes this article. In fact it may even be less realistic given how artists are not experts in every field and more often than not take wide liberties (see dinosaurs)

      • nkrisc an hour ago

        If you care, you can hire an artist and a subject matter expert to collaborate and produce accurate (to current scientific knowledge) renderings.

        Or even an artist who has prior experience creating accurate renderings from archeological data.

        If you care.

      • IncreasePosts 5 hours ago

        I think they're commenting on "Midjounrey"